我老姐在这个学校,这些学校与我猜的问题比本文更复杂。以下是我作为一个家长的猜测。本文给出的理由“魏泽福独立学区说,他们觉得他们不可能有人训练给一个肾上腺素auto-injector在学校是开放的。”Isn't just regarding the inconvenience of training - all the teachers and admins go through the training. The issue is really access to the epinephrine which is locked in the nurses office. Our nurses are contract employees (as I understand it) and the nurses offices have limited key access. They also have to follow different access requirements because of also housing student medications and medical records. So to have a trained person on staff and authorization and keys for entry to the nurses office is a different bag of chips. The school buildings are used outside of school hours by outside groups as well. Your now talking about keeping a specialized staff member in the building for over 12 hours a day most days. Benedryl being an OTC drug (and cheap) can be stored differently and in more locations. Our district also (and I've seen the numbers my self) has a very low rate of allergy. Having benedryl is better than having nothing - which is the past practice. I have always authorized the nurse at my child's school to use her epi if it would save a life. While I appreciate the work of this group the expectation that schools stock a serious medication like epinephrine that is crazy expensive, results in hospitalization, and has serious side effects is unrealistic. Administering benedryl and calling the paramedics is a reasonable response I think.

这是废话。培训员工需要学校护士30分钟。越多越好,但这是所有他们需要知道如何使用auto-injector。最重要的是,如果他们选择供给与Auvi-Q auto-injector声音指令,当你把帽子走所有的人通过如何使用它。他们担心被钩进行不必要的医院访问,但学生的潜在死亡真的值得冒这个风险吗?

这是一个可怕的情况。谢谢你的支持!